| 摘要: |
| 通过采用边缘不上蜡法和边缘补强法测试瓦楞纸板的边压强度，用SPSS数据统计软件分析比较了2种测试方法在进行纸箱抗压力预测计算时的拟合优劣，引用Eulerian弹性受压变形理论论证，从实验和理论上证明了2种边压强度测试方法在用于马基公式计算纸箱抗压力预测值时的可替代性。分析指出了用凯里卡特公式预测计算纸箱抗压力时，用边压强度代替原纸的综合环压，其抗压力预测值与实测值的拟合度更高。 |
| 关键词: 边压强度 测试方法 补强 抗压力 比较 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:TB484.1; TB487 |
| 基金项目:中国质量监督检验检疫总局科研项目（2011IK257） |
|
| Comparison of Two Edgewise Crush Test Methods of Corrugated Fiberboard |
|
ZHOU Ying-hong, GUO Ren-hong, LI Min
|
|
Guangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Centre, Guangzhou 510623, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Edgewise crush strength of corrugated cardboard was tested using un-waxed edge method and edge reinforced method. The advantages of the two methods in fitting for the cardboard compression strength prediction were analyzed and compared using SPSS software. The fungibility of the two methods in cardboard compression strength prediction based on Makee formula was proved empirically and theoretically using Eulerian elastic compressive deformation theory. It was concluded that when using the Kellicutt formula to calculate the compression strength, the fit statistics of the predicted compression strength with lab test readings is higher when replace the edge crush strength with the integrated ring crush of base paper. |
| Key words: edgewise crush strength test method reinforce compression strength comparison |
渝公网安备 50010702501716号